<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 5 Reasons Why the Novel Is Not A Dying Medium</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.litdrift.com/2009/10/27/5-reasons-why-the-novel-is-not-a-dying-medium/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.litdrift.com/2009/10/27/5-reasons-why-the-novel-is-not-a-dying-medium/</link>
	<description>Storytelling in the 21st Century</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:02:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthology of Interest &#124; Brews and Books</title>
		<link>http://www.litdrift.com/2009/10/27/5-reasons-why-the-novel-is-not-a-dying-medium/comment-page-1/#comment-3015</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthology of Interest &#124; Brews and Books</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Oct 2010 13:34:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.litdrift.com/?p=2461#comment-3015</guid>
		<description>[...] Internet presents a number of wonderful new ways to create and distribute literature, and I firmly deny, deny, deny when faced with the all-too-ubiquitous argument that the Internet is killing the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Internet presents a number of wonderful new ways to create and distribute literature, and I firmly deny, deny, deny when faced with the all-too-ubiquitous argument that the Internet is killing the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: S.Crow</title>
		<link>http://www.litdrift.com/2009/10/27/5-reasons-why-the-novel-is-not-a-dying-medium/comment-page-1/#comment-672</link>
		<dc:creator>S.Crow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 05:50:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.litdrift.com/?p=2461#comment-672</guid>
		<description>One other thing to point out is how technology is changing even the printed medium of books for the better. With print-on-demand technology, it&#039;s cheaper to create a book now than ever, now that the publisher doesn&#039;t have to worry about monumental overhead and unsold novels in mountains gathering dust in some warehouse somewhere, losing the publishing company profit every day they sit unsold. 

I love technology. It means a publisher may be more likely to take a chance on me now. It&#039;s CHEAPER now. Less of a risk! Yay technology! Bring it on, baby!

http://www.ondemandbooks.com/home.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One other thing to point out is how technology is changing even the printed medium of books for the better. With print-on-demand technology, it&#8217;s cheaper to create a book now than ever, now that the publisher doesn&#8217;t have to worry about monumental overhead and unsold novels in mountains gathering dust in some warehouse somewhere, losing the publishing company profit every day they sit unsold. </p>
<p>I love technology. It means a publisher may be more likely to take a chance on me now. It&#8217;s CHEAPER now. Less of a risk! Yay technology! Bring it on, baby!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ondemandbooks.com/home.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.ondemandbooks.com/home.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: More Philip Roth Wrath &#171; The Ligan of the Disomus</title>
		<link>http://www.litdrift.com/2009/10/27/5-reasons-why-the-novel-is-not-a-dying-medium/comment-page-1/#comment-527</link>
		<dc:creator>More Philip Roth Wrath &#171; The Ligan of the Disomus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 17:07:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.litdrift.com/?p=2461#comment-527</guid>
		<description>[...] November 2009 by nelsonleith    Ok, so maybe &#8220;wrath&#8221; is a strong word to describe JK Evanczuk&#8217;s five-point refutation of Roth&#8217;s assertion that the novel would end up a cult item within a quarter century, but I was glad to see someone [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] November 2009 by nelsonleith    Ok, so maybe &#8220;wrath&#8221; is a strong word to describe JK Evanczuk&#8217;s five-point refutation of Roth&#8217;s assertion that the novel would end up a cult item within a quarter century, but I was glad to see someone [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George LaCas</title>
		<link>http://www.litdrift.com/2009/10/27/5-reasons-why-the-novel-is-not-a-dying-medium/comment-page-1/#comment-514</link>
		<dc:creator>George LaCas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 22:23:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.litdrift.com/?p=2461#comment-514</guid>
		<description>Personally, I don&#039;t believe in &quot;the death of the novel,&quot; since this prediction has been made since the birth of the novel.  The novel will continue to evolve as a form of literature, and as an art form.

Technology is always a factor in change.  However, I don&#039;t think even the combined power of the Internet (which I am loath to capitalize), television, e-readers, smart phones, and whatever earth-shattering new gadgetry will be choking our superstores and landfills in the next several decades, have the power of the novel.

It&#039;s refreshing to see writers and the rest of the publishing industry embracing the convergence of fiction and technology, and I applaud the efforts of those who manage to get people to read books through innovation.  However, we must always remember that technology serves us--we do not serve it.

As long as there are people to read them, there will be books.  

The novel will never die, and I for one refuse to stop writing them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally, I don&#8217;t believe in &#8220;the death of the novel,&#8221; since this prediction has been made since the birth of the novel.  The novel will continue to evolve as a form of literature, and as an art form.</p>
<p>Technology is always a factor in change.  However, I don&#8217;t think even the combined power of the Internet (which I am loath to capitalize), television, e-readers, smart phones, and whatever earth-shattering new gadgetry will be choking our superstores and landfills in the next several decades, have the power of the novel.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s refreshing to see writers and the rest of the publishing industry embracing the convergence of fiction and technology, and I applaud the efforts of those who manage to get people to read books through innovation.  However, we must always remember that technology serves us&#8211;we do not serve it.</p>
<p>As long as there are people to read them, there will be books.  </p>
<p>The novel will never die, and I for one refuse to stop writing them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tanya Paperny</title>
		<link>http://www.litdrift.com/2009/10/27/5-reasons-why-the-novel-is-not-a-dying-medium/comment-page-1/#comment-505</link>
		<dc:creator>Tanya Paperny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 17:56:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.litdrift.com/?p=2461#comment-505</guid>
		<description>Yes, yes, yes, yes, and yes!!!

I will say, about attention span comment, that I was most productive yesterday because I didn&#039;t have internet access. I wrote for like 4 hours straight.  Usually I&#039;ll interrupt with some facebook checking or email checking.  So we all still have the capacity for uninterrupted interest in books, we just need to force ourselves to minimize the distractions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, yes, yes, yes, and yes!!!</p>
<p>I will say, about attention span comment, that I was most productive yesterday because I didn&#8217;t have internet access. I wrote for like 4 hours straight.  Usually I&#8217;ll interrupt with some facebook checking or email checking.  So we all still have the capacity for uninterrupted interest in books, we just need to force ourselves to minimize the distractions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vol. 1 Brooklyn</title>
		<link>http://www.litdrift.com/2009/10/27/5-reasons-why-the-novel-is-not-a-dying-medium/comment-page-1/#comment-495</link>
		<dc:creator>Vol. 1 Brooklyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 13:38:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.litdrift.com/?p=2461#comment-495</guid>
		<description>[...] Drift doesn&#8217;t buy into all that &#8220;death of the novel&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Drift doesn&#8217;t buy into all that &#8220;death of the novel&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.litdrift.com/2009/10/27/5-reasons-why-the-novel-is-not-a-dying-medium/comment-page-1/#comment-484</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 13:55:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.litdrift.com/?p=2461#comment-484</guid>
		<description>Reasons 3 and 4 don&#039;t hold up to scrutiny. Sorry.

I really want to believe you, but your logic is hella faulty.

Novels require deep levels of concentration, without distractions. All facebook is is distractions. 

I have never read more than a few lines of a fiction story on the internet anywhere. Because some messages me, or I get an email, or whatever. A crowdsourced twitter novel isn&#039;t even close to being art, it&#039;s more like playing Madlibs with a bunch of strangers.

TRY AGAIN.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reasons 3 and 4 don&#8217;t hold up to scrutiny. Sorry.</p>
<p>I really want to believe you, but your logic is hella faulty.</p>
<p>Novels require deep levels of concentration, without distractions. All facebook is is distractions. </p>
<p>I have never read more than a few lines of a fiction story on the internet anywhere. Because some messages me, or I get an email, or whatever. A crowdsourced twitter novel isn&#8217;t even close to being art, it&#8217;s more like playing Madlibs with a bunch of strangers.</p>
<p>TRY AGAIN.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Page Turner &#171; Existentialists and Marvels</title>
		<link>http://www.litdrift.com/2009/10/27/5-reasons-why-the-novel-is-not-a-dying-medium/comment-page-1/#comment-482</link>
		<dc:creator>Page Turner &#171; Existentialists and Marvels</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 13:28:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.litdrift.com/?p=2461#comment-482</guid>
		<description>[...] a lot of my socio-cultural itches, stare skeptically at Kindle for the same reasons I do, and they&#8217;ve got the novel&#8217;s back even if, like always, it&#8217;s supposed to be [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a lot of my socio-cultural itches, stare skeptically at Kindle for the same reasons I do, and they&#8217;ve got the novel&#8217;s back even if, like always, it&#8217;s supposed to be [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WDE</title>
		<link>http://www.litdrift.com/2009/10/27/5-reasons-why-the-novel-is-not-a-dying-medium/comment-page-1/#comment-476</link>
		<dc:creator>WDE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 20:33:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.litdrift.com/?p=2461#comment-476</guid>
		<description>I feel like doom-and-gloom is a generational thing.  The young writers (most between 22-35) in my MFA program are overwhelmingly positive about the future of reading and literature, while the baby-boomer faculty are overwhelmingly gloomy. Maybe it&#039;s because they came of age during that decade or two when literary fiction was unusually popular, or maybe it&#039;s something else. It&#039;s easy to forget that novel-readers have been a minority for almost all of the novels&#039; history, and that skimmable popular literature-- whether pulps, broadsides, street ballads or collaborative online snarkage-- has made up a huge part of what people read since basically forever.  It&#039;s a losing proposition to expect everyone who reads to be reading on the cutting edge.  For anyone who&#039;s paying attention, we are living in a wonderful time for fiction (one I will probably look back on with my own curmudgeonly nostalgia when I&#039;m 75).  The people who *aren&#039;t* paying attention aren&#039;t hurting anyone.  They&#039;re just doing what most people have done for most of history.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel like doom-and-gloom is a generational thing.  The young writers (most between 22-35) in my MFA program are overwhelmingly positive about the future of reading and literature, while the baby-boomer faculty are overwhelmingly gloomy. Maybe it&#8217;s because they came of age during that decade or two when literary fiction was unusually popular, or maybe it&#8217;s something else. It&#8217;s easy to forget that novel-readers have been a minority for almost all of the novels&#8217; history, and that skimmable popular literature&#8211; whether pulps, broadsides, street ballads or collaborative online snarkage&#8211; has made up a huge part of what people read since basically forever.  It&#8217;s a losing proposition to expect everyone who reads to be reading on the cutting edge.  For anyone who&#8217;s paying attention, we are living in a wonderful time for fiction (one I will probably look back on with my own curmudgeonly nostalgia when I&#8217;m 75).  The people who *aren&#8217;t* paying attention aren&#8217;t hurting anyone.  They&#8217;re just doing what most people have done for most of history.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Online Book Store and News - In the News: Sanford Shrugs, Planet for Sale?</title>
		<link>http://www.litdrift.com/2009/10/27/5-reasons-why-the-novel-is-not-a-dying-medium/comment-page-1/#comment-475</link>
		<dc:creator>Online Book Store and News - In the News: Sanford Shrugs, Planet for Sale?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 19:19:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.litdrift.com/?p=2461#comment-475</guid>
		<description>[...] Maybe the novel isn&#8217;t dying. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Maybe the novel isn&#8217;t dying. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

