<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: When Does Technology Stop Giving Us Opportunities And Instead Start Becoming A Distraction?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.litdrift.com/2009/11/16/when-does-technology-stop-giving-us-opportunities-and-instead-start-becoming-a-distraction/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.litdrift.com/2009/11/16/when-does-technology-stop-giving-us-opportunities-and-instead-start-becoming-a-distraction/</link>
	<description>Storytelling in the 21st Century</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 22:04:22 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Alex Lam</title>
		<link>http://www.litdrift.com/2009/11/16/when-does-technology-stop-giving-us-opportunities-and-instead-start-becoming-a-distraction/comment-page-1/#comment-644</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Lam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 02:44:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.litdrift.com/?p=2756#comment-644</guid>
		<description>3D technology is not refined enough to make it on the small screen and as you said, is just... totally pointless.  As for the possibilities of television&#039;s future - engaging the remaining senses in the experience of the program seems to defeat the original purpose of relaxing and vegging out in front of your TV set.  I can&#039;t imagine coming home from a long day, plopping on my couch and smelling Charlie Kelly.  He&#039;s funnier without the BO that I assume he has.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>3D technology is not refined enough to make it on the small screen and as you said, is just&#8230; totally pointless.  As for the possibilities of television&#8217;s future &#8211; engaging the remaining senses in the experience of the program seems to defeat the original purpose of relaxing and vegging out in front of your TV set.  I can&#8217;t imagine coming home from a long day, plopping on my couch and smelling Charlie Kelly.  He&#8217;s funnier without the BO that I assume he has.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liz</title>
		<link>http://www.litdrift.com/2009/11/16/when-does-technology-stop-giving-us-opportunities-and-instead-start-becoming-a-distraction/comment-page-1/#comment-641</link>
		<dc:creator>Liz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 21:32:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.litdrift.com/?p=2756#comment-641</guid>
		<description>Well unlike Andrew...I really enjoy some 3D movies like Coraline (avatar will be awesome btws

However, why the hell would you want a 3D tv? For some of the reasons you already cited, I think 3D tv would dumb.

No seriously.

1) I can&#039;t imagine most of my shows currently on TV because a) the story doesn&#039;t make sense in 3D. b)even the most hi-tech shows are graphically subpar. The 3D would only emphasize that. 

2) I don&#039;t think networks will invest in making their shows 3D it will blow up budgets and at that point...it&#039;s called a movie stupid.

3) 3D is made for a big wide screen so you can experience it.That&#039;s why I saw Coraline at the Ziegfeld (giant screen) or HP is best in Imax 3D (though I think HP5 in imax 3D &gt; hp6 in imax 3D). Additionally, not everyone likes, or can afford a giant screen tv.

So I say NO to THREE DEE TEE VEE</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well unlike Andrew&#8230;I really enjoy some 3D movies like Coraline (avatar will be awesome btws</p>
<p>However, why the hell would you want a 3D tv? For some of the reasons you already cited, I think 3D tv would dumb.</p>
<p>No seriously.</p>
<p>1) I can&#8217;t imagine most of my shows currently on TV because a) the story doesn&#8217;t make sense in 3D. b)even the most hi-tech shows are graphically subpar. The 3D would only emphasize that. </p>
<p>2) I don&#8217;t think networks will invest in making their shows 3D it will blow up budgets and at that point&#8230;it&#8217;s called a movie stupid.</p>
<p>3) 3D is made for a big wide screen so you can experience it.That&#8217;s why I saw Coraline at the Ziegfeld (giant screen) or HP is best in Imax 3D (though I think HP5 in imax 3D &gt; hp6 in imax 3D). Additionally, not everyone likes, or can afford a giant screen tv.</p>
<p>So I say NO to THREE DEE TEE VEE</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.litdrift.com/2009/11/16/when-does-technology-stop-giving-us-opportunities-and-instead-start-becoming-a-distraction/comment-page-1/#comment-640</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 21:18:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.litdrift.com/?p=2756#comment-640</guid>
		<description>Terrible idea. I hate - HATE - all of those 3D movies they have in theaters. I saw Harry Potter in 3D in IMAX and it was retarded. The colors were off, nothing was in proper focus, I would have much rathered it just be in plain ol&#039; 2D - Thank God only a few scenes were actually in 3D. I also watched Coraline at home in 3D - and that was even ... Read MoreWORSE. I had a headache, about 30min through I had to switch it over to 2D. It was a technicolor, out of focus nighmare. 

Until they perfect (and I mean perfect) this 3D garbage, keep everything in 2D.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Terrible idea. I hate &#8211; HATE &#8211; all of those 3D movies they have in theaters. I saw Harry Potter in 3D in IMAX and it was retarded. The colors were off, nothing was in proper focus, I would have much rathered it just be in plain ol&#8217; 2D &#8211; Thank God only a few scenes were actually in 3D. I also watched Coraline at home in 3D &#8211; and that was even &#8230; Read MoreWORSE. I had a headache, about 30min through I had to switch it over to 2D. It was a technicolor, out of focus nighmare. </p>
<p>Until they perfect (and I mean perfect) this 3D garbage, keep everything in 2D.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
