<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apparently Women Can&#8217;t Write</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.litdrift.com/2009/11/18/apparently-women-cant-write/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.litdrift.com/2009/11/18/apparently-women-cant-write/</link>
	<description>Storytelling in the 21st Century</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 18:18:52 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mary</title>
		<link>http://www.litdrift.com/2009/11/18/apparently-women-cant-write/comment-page-1/#comment-908</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Dec 2009 00:32:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.litdrift.com/?p=2782#comment-908</guid>
		<description>Publisher&#039;s Weekly is taken seriously by a lot of people, so yes, this is a big deal. I think a lot of women (including some of those writing comments) are quite complacent about the status of sexism in our society--it&#039;s still there, in a more insidious form. Women DO write differently than men, on the whole, just as women vote differently than men (generally, we&#039;re more liberal) and have different political concerns. Let&#039;s not insult anybody&#039;s intelligence by suggesting that gender differences have no impact whatsoever on ideology, beliefs, behaviours, etc. Gender is not transparent. Women writers did not appear on this list in part because the male-dominated selection committee does not think their voices &quot;matter&quot;.

Some may think this all sounds inflammatory. But come on: take a look at who occupies all the positions of power in our society (politicians, executives, etc.) and look at which gender, on average, makes more money than the other. Sexism is alive and well, and it just becomes more pernicious if we all allow things like this list a pass.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Publisher&#8217;s Weekly is taken seriously by a lot of people, so yes, this is a big deal. I think a lot of women (including some of those writing comments) are quite complacent about the status of sexism in our society&#8211;it&#8217;s still there, in a more insidious form. Women DO write differently than men, on the whole, just as women vote differently than men (generally, we&#8217;re more liberal) and have different political concerns. Let&#8217;s not insult anybody&#8217;s intelligence by suggesting that gender differences have no impact whatsoever on ideology, beliefs, behaviours, etc. Gender is not transparent. Women writers did not appear on this list in part because the male-dominated selection committee does not think their voices &#8220;matter&#8221;.</p>
<p>Some may think this all sounds inflammatory. But come on: take a look at who occupies all the positions of power in our society (politicians, executives, etc.) and look at which gender, on average, makes more money than the other. Sexism is alive and well, and it just becomes more pernicious if we all allow things like this list a pass.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alex</title>
		<link>http://www.litdrift.com/2009/11/18/apparently-women-cant-write/comment-page-1/#comment-817</link>
		<dc:creator>alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 02:19:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.litdrift.com/?p=2782#comment-817</guid>
		<description>It is said by feminist literary critics that if you take two books, one written by a male and the other a female, and crossed out the names of the authors, the reader would not be able to tell the sex of the person writing it with a truly great work of literature.

As a woman and a writer, I believe it is more important to focus on the successes of woman in literature, instead of being angry about a list made by group of people sitting fatly in overstuffed chairs in a boardroom somewhere. It is purely opinion, and while it may be unjust, it is important to remember that we live in a time where we are lucky that we can write under our own names instead of a male pen name; that our voices can be heard. 

If this year went the the men; hell, it happens. This just means as writers we need to step up our game and prove ourselves just as worthy of a top ten list.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is said by feminist literary critics that if you take two books, one written by a male and the other a female, and crossed out the names of the authors, the reader would not be able to tell the sex of the person writing it with a truly great work of literature.</p>
<p>As a woman and a writer, I believe it is more important to focus on the successes of woman in literature, instead of being angry about a list made by group of people sitting fatly in overstuffed chairs in a boardroom somewhere. It is purely opinion, and while it may be unjust, it is important to remember that we live in a time where we are lucky that we can write under our own names instead of a male pen name; that our voices can be heard. </p>
<p>If this year went the the men; hell, it happens. This just means as writers we need to step up our game and prove ourselves just as worthy of a top ten list.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tanya Paperny</title>
		<link>http://www.litdrift.com/2009/11/18/apparently-women-cant-write/comment-page-1/#comment-725</link>
		<dc:creator>Tanya Paperny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 19:22:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.litdrift.com/?p=2782#comment-725</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s absurd.  No need to be inflammatory.  Being a feminist doesn&#039;t mean blindly voting for a woman because she&#039;s a woman.  And I said nothing about feminism in this post.  The editors&#039; status as feminists is not the question at hand -- they never purported to be feminists. The point is that they are not outraged and upset that their results were a list of ten men.  They could have made a point to address that, speculate on what it means about the industry, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s absurd.  No need to be inflammatory.  Being a feminist doesn&#8217;t mean blindly voting for a woman because she&#8217;s a woman.  And I said nothing about feminism in this post.  The editors&#8217; status as feminists is not the question at hand &#8212; they never purported to be feminists. The point is that they are not outraged and upset that their results were a list of ten men.  They could have made a point to address that, speculate on what it means about the industry, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HesedBooks</title>
		<link>http://www.litdrift.com/2009/11/18/apparently-women-cant-write/comment-page-1/#comment-712</link>
		<dc:creator>HesedBooks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 20:15:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.litdrift.com/?p=2782#comment-712</guid>
		<description>I remember being really shocked when I read the PW &quot;Best Books of 2009&quot; list because of the rather flippant commentary before the list. 

My guess is they wanted to be &#039;up front&#039; about their choices (since they figured many people would notice the lack of women on the list), but I think they did more harm than good with their &#039;commentary.&#039; 

I obviously can&#039;t say that what they chose was &#039;wrong&#039; because the list is only an opinion of which books they thought were best. But instead of tackling how &#039;politically incorrect&#039; the list was, couldn&#039;t they have done a better job of explaining the value of the books in the intro? Books should be chosen because of their content -- not necessarily because of who wrote them. 

By the way @Courtney: Agreed! Way to go geeks!

And @Tanya Paperny: Agreed; they could have made an effort to write about women in the industry instead of not doing anything at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remember being really shocked when I read the PW &#8220;Best Books of 2009&#8243; list because of the rather flippant commentary before the list. </p>
<p>My guess is they wanted to be &#8216;up front&#8217; about their choices (since they figured many people would notice the lack of women on the list), but I think they did more harm than good with their &#8216;commentary.&#8217; </p>
<p>I obviously can&#8217;t say that what they chose was &#8216;wrong&#8217; because the list is only an opinion of which books they thought were best. But instead of tackling how &#8216;politically incorrect&#8217; the list was, couldn&#8217;t they have done a better job of explaining the value of the books in the intro? Books should be chosen because of their content &#8212; not necessarily because of who wrote them. </p>
<p>By the way @Courtney: Agreed! Way to go geeks!</p>
<p>And @Tanya Paperny: Agreed; they could have made an effort to write about women in the industry instead of not doing anything at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcella K</title>
		<link>http://www.litdrift.com/2009/11/18/apparently-women-cant-write/comment-page-1/#comment-711</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcella K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 16:26:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.litdrift.com/?p=2782#comment-711</guid>
		<description>Should I have voted for Sarah Palin because I&#039;m a feminist?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Should I have voted for Sarah Palin because I&#8217;m a feminist?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SpikeTheLobster</title>
		<link>http://www.litdrift.com/2009/11/18/apparently-women-cant-write/comment-page-1/#comment-701</link>
		<dc:creator>SpikeTheLobster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 20:44:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.litdrift.com/?p=2782#comment-701</guid>
		<description>&quot;I’m suggesting that whatever methods they used where clearly flawed if they got these results.&quot;

I&#039;m sorry, you mean this isn&#039;t a satire piece? I thought such nonsensical gibberish went away after the 1990s. It&#039;s a &quot;top ten&quot;, not a &quot;top ten carefully selected so as not to offend any possible minority, majority, political or religious group, animal breed or anyone else who might possibly be unhappy about it&quot;.

What does it matter if the top ten books were written by men? Or women? Or children? Or purple giraffes with homosexual tendencies? The only reason it&#039;s important to know who wrote them is so you can find other books by the same people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I’m suggesting that whatever methods they used where clearly flawed if they got these results.&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sorry, you mean this isn&#8217;t a satire piece? I thought such nonsensical gibberish went away after the 1990s. It&#8217;s a &#8220;top ten&#8221;, not a &#8220;top ten carefully selected so as not to offend any possible minority, majority, political or religious group, animal breed or anyone else who might possibly be unhappy about it&#8221;.</p>
<p>What does it matter if the top ten books were written by men? Or women? Or children? Or purple giraffes with homosexual tendencies? The only reason it&#8217;s important to know who wrote them is so you can find other books by the same people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Almost, not quite &#171; part animal</title>
		<link>http://www.litdrift.com/2009/11/18/apparently-women-cant-write/comment-page-1/#comment-695</link>
		<dc:creator>Almost, not quite &#171; part animal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 02:12:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.litdrift.com/?p=2782#comment-695</guid>
		<description>[...] Stitches which made Publisher&#8217;s Weekly&#8217;s top 10 books of the year. Yes, written by a man, just like every other author on the list. But cut them some slack! The book is so so so good and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Stitches which made Publisher&#8217;s Weekly&#8217;s top 10 books of the year. Yes, written by a man, just like every other author on the list. But cut them some slack! The book is so so so good and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tanya Paperny</title>
		<link>http://www.litdrift.com/2009/11/18/apparently-women-cant-write/comment-page-1/#comment-675</link>
		<dc:creator>Tanya Paperny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 18:00:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.litdrift.com/?p=2782#comment-675</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m suggesting that whatever methods they used where clearly flawed if they got these results.  

Even if that&#039;s not the case, I think PW could have made a much bigger stink about it, more than the sad hat-tip in the editor&#039;s note.  Perhaps an article about women in the publishing industry?  Why women make up 60% of the buyers and readers but probably a small fraction of authors (that might not be true for non-fiction)?  

Or maybe PW should reveal who the judges were. By simply looking at the masthead of their website, I deduced that of 25 senior editorial positions, only 9 are women (and I&#039;m guessing even less are people of color, etc.).

Yes to throw in a token woman and more people of color would have been offensive, but that doesn&#039;t mean there weren&#039;t other solutions and other responses that could have been made.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m suggesting that whatever methods they used where clearly flawed if they got these results.  </p>
<p>Even if that&#8217;s not the case, I think PW could have made a much bigger stink about it, more than the sad hat-tip in the editor&#8217;s note.  Perhaps an article about women in the publishing industry?  Why women make up 60% of the buyers and readers but probably a small fraction of authors (that might not be true for non-fiction)?  </p>
<p>Or maybe PW should reveal who the judges were. By simply looking at the masthead of their website, I deduced that of 25 senior editorial positions, only 9 are women (and I&#8217;m guessing even less are people of color, etc.).</p>
<p>Yes to throw in a token woman and more people of color would have been offensive, but that doesn&#8217;t mean there weren&#8217;t other solutions and other responses that could have been made.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eliza</title>
		<link>http://www.litdrift.com/2009/11/18/apparently-women-cant-write/comment-page-1/#comment-671</link>
		<dc:creator>Eliza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 02:41:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.litdrift.com/?p=2782#comment-671</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s sortof sad that this is even an issue. It&#039;s only ten books.

... So what?

I&#039;m a woman writer. A while ago it came to my attention that my favorite books all happened to be written by men, with the exception of two YA authors. It doesn&#039;t make me sexist. Get over it, people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s sortof sad that this is even an issue. It&#8217;s only ten books.</p>
<p>&#8230; So what?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m a woman writer. A while ago it came to my attention that my favorite books all happened to be written by men, with the exception of two YA authors. It doesn&#8217;t make me sexist. Get over it, people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Lam</title>
		<link>http://www.litdrift.com/2009/11/18/apparently-women-cant-write/comment-page-1/#comment-664</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Lam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 17:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.litdrift.com/?p=2782#comment-664</guid>
		<description>BOO URNS! BOO URNS!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BOO URNS! BOO URNS!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
