<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Electric Literature Vol. 3: Twitter Fiction Featured in Lit Mag</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.litdrift.com/2010/02/25/electric-literature-vol-3-twitter-fiction-featured-in-lit-mag/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.litdrift.com/2010/02/25/electric-literature-vol-3-twitter-fiction-featured-in-lit-mag/</link>
	<description>Storytelling in the 21st Century</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 19:12:27 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: George</title>
		<link>http://www.litdrift.com/2010/02/25/electric-literature-vol-3-twitter-fiction-featured-in-lit-mag/comment-page-1/#comment-1870</link>
		<dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Apr 2010 12:25:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.litdrift.com/?p=4194#comment-1870</guid>
		<description>I think in order to make a &quot;twitter novel&quot; work the format has to be changed a little. This piece of twitter fiction I found is really interesting: http://twitter.com/jaynakamura Basically the premise is that a celebrity living in the year 2045 is tweeting backwards in time to 2010. So it is not a regular narrative, but it is still fiction. Really interesting!

Read more: http://thephoenix.com/boston/arts/75180-novel-idea-twitter-fiction/#ixzz0m1Fll8l9</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think in order to make a &#8220;twitter novel&#8221; work the format has to be changed a little. This piece of twitter fiction I found is really interesting: <a href="http://twitter.com/jaynakamura" rel="nofollow">http://twitter.com/jaynakamura</a> Basically the premise is that a celebrity living in the year 2045 is tweeting backwards in time to 2010. So it is not a regular narrative, but it is still fiction. Really interesting!</p>
<p>Read more: <a href="http://thephoenix.com/boston/arts/75180-novel-idea-twitter-fiction/#ixzz0m1Fll8l9" rel="nofollow">http://thephoenix.com/boston/arts/75180-novel-idea-twitter-fiction/#ixzz0m1Fll8l9</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Icy Sedgwick</title>
		<link>http://www.litdrift.com/2010/02/25/electric-literature-vol-3-twitter-fiction-featured-in-lit-mag/comment-page-1/#comment-1533</link>
		<dc:creator>Icy Sedgwick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 10:41:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.litdrift.com/?p=4194#comment-1533</guid>
		<description>They&#039;ve been publishing Twitter novels in Japan for a good few months now. There&#039;s been a trend toward &#039;micro fiction&#039; in this country too for a while - there&#039;s even a website dedicated to &#039;mobile interactive fiction&#039;. I guess you have to keep with the times.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They&#8217;ve been publishing Twitter novels in Japan for a good few months now. There&#8217;s been a trend toward &#8216;micro fiction&#8217; in this country too for a while &#8211; there&#8217;s even a website dedicated to &#8216;mobile interactive fiction&#8217;. I guess you have to keep with the times.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erik</title>
		<link>http://www.litdrift.com/2010/02/25/electric-literature-vol-3-twitter-fiction-featured-in-lit-mag/comment-page-1/#comment-1486</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 23:06:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.litdrift.com/?p=4194#comment-1486</guid>
		<description>The entire issue is great, and for what it&#039;s worth, I almost didn&#039;t want to like the Moody piece, but like any good story, I think it will suck you in.  There&#039;s a lot of subtext created by the spaces between the tweets that fill it out surprisingly well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The entire issue is great, and for what it&#8217;s worth, I almost didn&#8217;t want to like the Moody piece, but like any good story, I think it will suck you in.  There&#8217;s a lot of subtext created by the spaces between the tweets that fill it out surprisingly well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sherrie</title>
		<link>http://www.litdrift.com/2010/02/25/electric-literature-vol-3-twitter-fiction-featured-in-lit-mag/comment-page-1/#comment-1484</link>
		<dc:creator>sherrie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 19:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.litdrift.com/?p=4194#comment-1484</guid>
		<description>I am a traditionalist, which means I&#039;ll die one day and my opinions will go with me. 

I like a magazine to be a magazine, a book to to be a book, and a Twitter feed to be full of short, pithy statements and helpful links - and not necessarily tell me a story.  My favorite Tweeters offer me daily commentary on politics, wine, food, crafting, etc - in some way, their commentary becomes a narrative with a voice, but nobody&#039;s attempting Tolstoyian feats of storytelling and I appreciate that.   A book of Tweets?  Why not just go open up my laptop and type a simple URL and read them there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a traditionalist, which means I&#8217;ll die one day and my opinions will go with me. </p>
<p>I like a magazine to be a magazine, a book to to be a book, and a Twitter feed to be full of short, pithy statements and helpful links &#8211; and not necessarily tell me a story.  My favorite Tweeters offer me daily commentary on politics, wine, food, crafting, etc &#8211; in some way, their commentary becomes a narrative with a voice, but nobody&#8217;s attempting Tolstoyian feats of storytelling and I appreciate that.   A book of Tweets?  Why not just go open up my laptop and type a simple URL and read them there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HPL</title>
		<link>http://www.litdrift.com/2010/02/25/electric-literature-vol-3-twitter-fiction-featured-in-lit-mag/comment-page-1/#comment-1483</link>
		<dc:creator>HPL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 18:50:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.litdrift.com/?p=4194#comment-1483</guid>
		<description>I dunno, Gary...I gotta disagree.  Big beefy paragraphs are nice, but given all the nontraditional reading we do these days, I think a book like this is an interesting way to push the boundaries.  It always pisses me off when people say &quot;no one reads anymore&quot; because let&#039;s face it -- our parents write emails, tweets and comments on blogs like total morons.  Why?  Because we&#039;re more literate than they are, due to our constant tweeting, commenting, emailing, etc.  Perhaps it&#039;s counterintuitive, but it&#039;s true.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dunno, Gary&#8230;I gotta disagree.  Big beefy paragraphs are nice, but given all the nontraditional reading we do these days, I think a book like this is an interesting way to push the boundaries.  It always pisses me off when people say &#8220;no one reads anymore&#8221; because let&#8217;s face it &#8212; our parents write emails, tweets and comments on blogs like total morons.  Why?  Because we&#8217;re more literate than they are, due to our constant tweeting, commenting, emailing, etc.  Perhaps it&#8217;s counterintuitive, but it&#8217;s true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary</title>
		<link>http://www.litdrift.com/2010/02/25/electric-literature-vol-3-twitter-fiction-featured-in-lit-mag/comment-page-1/#comment-1480</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 18:15:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.litdrift.com/?p=4194#comment-1480</guid>
		<description>This sounds like a horrible idea, but I am interested to see if they can actually pull it off.  Maybe I&#039;m just a traditionalist who likes to see big beefy paragraphs.  Sure you can convey a thought in a 140 characters, but will it compel me to read the next 140 characters?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This sounds like a horrible idea, but I am interested to see if they can actually pull it off.  Maybe I&#8217;m just a traditionalist who likes to see big beefy paragraphs.  Sure you can convey a thought in a 140 characters, but will it compel me to read the next 140 characters?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
