Comments on: I Hate The Classics. There. I Said It.

By: Scarletfury16

Scarletfury16 — Thu, 09 Dec 2010 20:25:00 +0000

This was funny! I had to laugh, because I was able to make it through some of the classics in my childhood years and now in university when I have to read a few chapters here and there to at least sound like I know what I’m talking about, I can’t bring myself to read longer than a paragraph. I appreciate Jane Austen and what she did/wrote, but for the life of me, I’ve yet to calmly and coherently read anything that she’s written, apart from the very first famous line of pride and prejudice…(and I really did want to read that one).

By: Melanie Wilson

Melanie Wilson — Thu, 02 Dec 2010 15:13:00 +0000

Many classics I’ve read I’ve enjoyed. Some didn’t do it for me. I think I’d rather be angry at the characters than bored, personally. You’re not supposed to like every character, but I think you should have a reaction to them.
I don’t think you should force yourself to read something you hate, since there is so much out there to read and so little time to read it, but I do think it’s good to at least try to stretch your mind a bit and read something you find dense and/or difficult, or at least try to understand what others might see as its redeeming qualities.

P.S. “Sadly, after only a few listens, Wuthering Heights and it’s rhythmic, soothing British author ended up being my surefire way to get to sleep at the end of a 13 hour day.”
I think you mean “its rhythmic”.

By: Brandon

Brandon — Fri, 10 Sep 2010 02:33:23 +0000

I can’t imagine ANYONE that isn’t an egoist liking anything by Ayn Rand. I read Jane Eyre (for pleasure) in the 11th grade, and I spent half of my time looking in the thesaurus because Charlotte Brontë just couldn’t use the word ‘curtain’. She had to give us the French word (which rendered the using of a thesaurus useless). I didn’t really like Huckleberry Finn either. I appreciate its impact on literature, but I never liked it. It’s not that I’m too lazy to read it or ‘get it’. I’m just not a fan. However, I could read To Kill a Mockingbird over and over again for the rest of my life. Sir Arthur Conan Doyle never ceases to amaze me.

It’s all a matter of taste, and people like Tara infuriate me to no end with their haughty attitude. I think that, while classic literature needs to be read, it’s stupid to waste your time trying to finish a book that you hate when you could be dedicating that time reading something you enjoy. Besides, our generation (especially those who are aspiring writers) should be focusing more on works that have been published since 1900 as opposed to an Austen book that’s close to 200 years old.

By: Angela

Angela — Wed, 18 Aug 2010 23:16:18 +0000

You should go to England. I hated many of the classics, especially Dickens, and so I took English classes in college so that I HAD to read it instead of reading it “for pleasure,” which I would certainly never do in my spare time.

It wasn’t until this summer, when I went to England that I started to re-read some of the literature that people over there simply grew up with, that I really started to appreciate it. The American viewpoint of English Classics is really different, compared with the British viewpoint. With authors like Dickens and Orwell, and even Jane Austen (not Austin), we can easily be like blah blah blah the poor, blah blah romance…but when I rediscovered them with an eye towards English culture in general, their themes of the division of wealth between East and West London, the British childcare and education system (children dont grow up with their parents, really), British-French relations, British gender relations, the history of aristocracy, etc, made me grow to appreciate the classics. And not only appreciate but love it.

You should also check out BBC mini-serieses of those Austen books, they’re pretty good and true to the book. Check out the Johnny Lee Miller and Romola Garai Emma. It’s not just about a superficial girl who gossips and matchmakes people, promise. Austen was (hopefully) more astute than that…

By: Tara

Tara — Tue, 15 Jun 2010 03:52:34 +0000

sorry but i think this is a really ignorant and gross generalization. first of all lumping ayn rand into this group of “difficult classics” is just plain wrong – the fountainhead and atlas shrugged, though long, are pop novels with cult followings, sort of like gone with the wind. secondly, if you’re going to criticize an author, at least learn how to spell her name. it’s austen.

i don’t know why you’re so proud of not ‘getting’ classic literature. also isn’t it potentially more transporting to read something from an entirely different time and place than a memoir or YA novel set here and now?

By: Shelley

Shelley — Fri, 11 Jun 2010 20:30:19 +0000

It’s a whole different frame of mind.

By: Andre

Andre — Wed, 09 Jun 2010 21:31:04 +0000

IMO – the article makes perfect sense. We all have different taste. I also believe that as time moves forward we, at least some us, find ourselves unable to be moved by the classics. I know, I know…who doesn’t like Huckleberry Finn? Well, I don’t. It doesn’t move me. Every two or three years I read Foundation Trilogy, by Asimov. I don’t ever plan to read The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn again. Why? It has nothing to do with the writing. It’s the story. I just don’t like it. Wanted to like it will not change the fact that I don’t. Time is limit, we never seem to have enough, so why waste it reading something you know you don’t like, just because someone else liked it and thought you should too?

By: Tasha

Tasha — Wed, 02 Jun 2010 14:59:15 +0000

There are too many good books to waste on the bad ones. I, too was an English Lit major, now MFA candidate. Although, I DID like Wuthering Heights, my big issue is hating Shakespeare. I’ve never been able to pick up his work and just read it for the pleasure of it. I have recently discovered some fascinating YA titles that are brilliantly done, books you may like. The author Francesca Lia Block’s Weetzie Bat is amazing. And then there is Suzanne Collins’ Hunger Games Trilogy which is a kind of Brave New World meets sci-fi. Anyway, they are both awesome. Happy reading!
PS–I once heard a writer when asked what are some of your favorite books respond “Every last one of them. If I don’t love it right from the start I find a new one.” A good philosophy, I think….

By: Steve

Steve — Fri, 28 May 2010 05:28:33 +0000

It’s easy to get mired in the dense prose of pre-20th century fiction. I figure the reading landscape from then is much like now — millions of books, but only so many that appeal to any given person. I definitely enjoy classics that are written in what I consider more accessible language – Steinbeck, Hemingway, and Twain immediately spring to mind. But then there’s also Melville and Poe and Dumas.
Any time I have to sort through dense description or pages of polite society or chapters on whale anatomy (Melville does come at a cost sometimes), I usually move on.

By: c.vales

c.vales — Tue, 25 May 2010 12:46:49 +0000

I wouldn’t paint a broad brush over all the classics. Perhaps quit tv for a week and see if your attention span returns. Honestly, it is telling that the tv generations like ours are just not used to devoting time to rereading passages that we just don’t absorb the first time. It’s radically shifted the publishing industry-we now must all write commercial things-that don’t have a chance at becoming classic-because we are not spending the time to read. And sadly that translates to not taking the time to write stories that have layers of metaphors, original form, etc. There are too many classics out there to say that they are all boring or ‘dreck’- read those titles that appeal to you, keep looking you will find them-and pay your dues. No one that writes today ought to do so without having read those great books of the past. I’m sorry I can”t praise you like these others-for being a philistine.