Header art by Pedro Lucena.
Updates, top stories & our favorite links straight to your inbox.


Email Marketing Powered by MailChimp

From One Young Writer to Another: More Than Just A Movie

Andrew Boryga / Monday, August 30, 2010 View Comments
A good flick once in a while can do you some good

A good flick once in a while can do you some good

There are a lot of ways in which college students spend their free time. Personally, I watch films. There’s nothing better than a good flick on a boring day. Last year, I probably rented out half the selection in the library and paid a ton of late fees (and accordingly got a Netflix account this year). I love films because they take me away for a couple hours, like a good novel. They inject fear, inspiration, laughter, knowledge and a whole bunch of other things into my day. And as a writer, they teach me a thing or two.

Before I jump into the benefits of watching good films, I really need to define what I mean by a film, or better yet, what I don’t mean. A film is not the summer box office hit you took your girl to. It’s not the action flick with explosions every two minutes and it’s not the drama with the played-out lines any half-conscious person can see coming a mile away. Don’t get me wrong, I dig those movies too––I’d watch Megan Fox in Transformers any day of the week––but that’s not what I’m talking about.

I’m talking about the films you’d never see on Fandango. The films that were never box office hits and that your favorite actor might’ve been in as a 22-year-old nobody. The films all your teachers and professors know about and always recommend. The films you only hear about when they’re racking up Academy Award nominations while you scratch your head, thinking, “When the hell did that come out?” You get the picture.

Besides having the ability to both entertain and to bring about all those aforementioned emotions, these films––for a writer––shed some light on what hooks people; what makes people remember a plot.

It’s easy to think of film and literature as totally different media, given that they don’t work with the same equipment and often take different approaches. That said, I think they’re really related. There’s a reason why some of the greatest films ever made are adaptations of novels. Now as far as I know, the relationship has never been the opposite (i.e. a film turned novel), but that doesn’t mean films aren’t helpful to writers. I think they can benefit the writer who watches more as a student and less as a person seeking entertainment.

To illustrate what I’m talking about, I’ll use one my favorite films, The Usual Suspects. The Usual Suspects is a favorite of mine in the genre of what I like call “knock-you-on-your-ass-films.” To sum it up, it’s a film about a crime retold by a dude in a police station. As the guy is telling the story, it’s all happening on screen and as a viewer you can’t help but be sucked into the plot. It has everything a good story needs: drama, love, greed, highs, lows, and so on. Then at the end, BAM! Turns out dude made the whole story up. Subsequently, you are knocked on your ass.

That was probably the worst movie review ever, but I’m not a critic. When I say to watch as a student, I don’t mean watch as a critic. I mean watch like you’re trying to get something out of it. So when I watched The Usual Suspects for the second time (couldn’t help but be solely entertained the first) I was looking for what moved me during the course of the film. What got me invested in the characters? What was left out or hidden from me? What was revealed? Why is it that, even though I had to pee, I didn’t budge? That’s the type of stuff I’m thinking about, and that’s the kind of stuff I make mental notes about.

And the answers aren’t easy; in fact, it’s really hard to even write about them. But if you watch enough movies, you’ll start to see trends. Which is why I would suggest younger writers with some more free time on their hands to watch some good movies. Check out the list of critically acclaimed ones. TIME has a list, and I’m sure there are plenty more out there. What I’ve found is that once you find a few good ones, there’s a breadcrumb effect and you just keep finding more and more.

  • Digg
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • http://Litdrift Alexander Gines

    Check out these titles Andrew marc:
    Women on the verge of a nervous breakdown
    Guess who’s coming to dinner
    They call me mr. Tibbs
    To sir with love
    Casablanca
    The Maltese falcon
    Priscilla queen of the desert

  • Duncan

    When I read stuff like this, it makes me so much more confident of my abilities with respect to other writers; this is something a high school senior would write. You know someone’s not very smart when they make a distinction between “film” and “movies”–both come from the same Hollywood machine so the whole “artistic” distinction is just laughable.

    But this article gets even better because right after making such a pompous distinction, he goes on to say the Usual Suspects is his favorite “film”–the paradigm of “so sick, so sick” cinema (because, you know, it’s got this sick twist). I mean, if you’re going to be a pompous film geek at least pick an art house movie. The irony here is that the Usual Suspects is no less accessible to the average intelligence than Transformers. In fact, I’m pretty sure I made the same film/movie distinction AND cited Usual Suspects as an example when I was in 6th grade. LOLZ. Let me guess, is Fight Club your second favorite “film” (written by the visionary and genius Chuck Palahnuik).

    Kids, do not listen to a word this guy says. If you want to feel smart, reead dosteyevsky.

    After the jump, Boryga says people who criticize should learn how to spell first.

blog comments powered by Disqus